How I came to appreciate menu planning

I didn’t think I could write about menu planning without sounding officious until I discovered that it was the method I used to teach myself how to cook. The officious part is about how, over a period of years, I became a person who has a printed binder full of recipes. Food is ubiquitous. Eating is this necessary thing and then feeding a family this other necessary thing booby-trapped with fussiness and your own culinary shortcomings. An official menu plan only came out of the anxiety of having to face the quintessential “what’s for supper” question, and I typed and printed 52 weeks’ worth of answers before my children could talk. The following is how it started and what it taught me.

A menu plan has levels of complexity. I don't think people talk about this enough. Planning meals in advance is the kind of thing that requires work. Eating requires no work. Having an appetite is taken for granted. Having money to feed yourself – also taken for granted. Menu planning therefore addresses itself to people lucky enough to have the leisure of thinking creatively about food. If you have time, you are lucky. If you have choice, you are lucky. Menu planning begins with a calendar, and an aversion for the panic caused by that supper-time question. To begin, all that is required is the jotting down of the meal eaten last night. Then, the meal to be had tonight. Write down the one for tomorrow night. Keep writing down the meals eaten. Forget, remember, catch up, delay, ask your partner, "what did we have that other day?" Rate the meals with stars, take notes, or don't. Write down two meals for next week – it makes shopping easier. If you eat the same meal twice or allow for leftovers to be transformed the next day, there are four days of the seven taken care of. Take a day off to remind yourself what spontaneity feels like, order in, use the BBQ, and voilà! One week is done! Commit it to the calendar. This is the beginning.

On the podcast Spectacular Failures, in an episode called "Blue Apron wilts, then rises to a new challenge", a guest comments that women want meals to be effortless, delicious and to "have the moral value of home cooking". "The thing that home cooking delivers that none of these other things do is that it satisfies, I think, what we all feel as the moral imperative to cook. There's something that just doesn't click in when the thing comes in from outside." A service like Blue Apron, the guest, Laura Shapiro argued, is less about cooking and more about assembling. "They kind of fool you into thinking you're cooking whereas real cooking hands-on cooking, knowledgeable cooking, has to do with cooking day after day, doesn't mean you're making fabulous, elaborate meals, day after day, even if it's the simplest possible thing; that's cooking." It’s that moral value that makes it hard to talk about menu planning because in the end, it’s like saying, I flossed every day last week. Nobody cares. And it’s expected of you. You benefit. Your neighbour doesn’t benefit from your menu plan, your friends don’t. Your circle of influence is the family. The glow of 52 weeks of recipes categorized by month and season is uninteresting to most people. 

But here’s the thing, in spite of all the discomfort of writing about one’s organizational habits like some amateur Martha Stewart, menu planning taught me how to cook.

I came into marriage young and inexperienced. I used to tell my friends that all I needed to do was learn how to cook and learn how to swim, both of which I though could be resolved in some classes, and then I’d be set. Let life begin. In fact, I shied away from cooking classes because none suited my desire for anonymity, and despite the swimming lessons, I was still afraid of water and could not master a front crawl. Instead of cooking, I started baking. Baking has delicious outcomes and does not involve meat. Baking has finicky instructions I like to follow and that attention to detail has its rewards. I applied the recipe-following I learned from baking to cooking. To ensure a satisfying end product, I picked recipes with consistent five-star reviews from the Food Network website. By following enough recipe instructions, I started to learn cooking terms. Cookbooks with pictures were also handy. One of the first that I purchased was Best Summer Weekendswhich I used it in winter too. I started to be able to associate words with tastes and textures. All this took years. Another thing that took years was gathering enough recipes we liked to span a year’s worth of week day meals. Finding inspiration is fun, but there is that dissonance between cookbook idea and everyday reality that has to be contended with and the only way to wear it down is with practice. Practice eventually accumulates and becomes experience. 

The work for the home cook is a sort of translation. Does this recipe suit our family’s tastes? Does it suit our schedule? How much are the ingredients? Are they easily available? In what season? Often, I think, regular home cooks are sold on ideals of delicious outcomes, or timely delivery, when really, cooking is mostly dull and repetitive. Even so, experience eventually yields an appreciation for the simple task… Good cookbook authors can convince you that if you do put in the work, you will eventually feel the reward. And they’re right. My favourite guides have been Nigella Lawson, Jenny Rosentrach and Deb Perelman, not to mention the Canal House ladies and Canadians like Ricardo, Anita Stewart and others. 

The last level of complexity in menu planning is to loosen your grip on menu planning. Eventually, accumulated experience and experimentation leads to a repertoire and a familiarity with sides and pantry items that allows for a little more spontaneity. If at first I couldn’t understand how fridge items could be their own source of inspiration, now I do. I can make salads, or flavour rice, or see if I have enough time to peel those layabout potatoes. I can count on having an idea of what to cook next week, but also a reassuring feeling that if I want to try something new, I can.

I think maybe this is why I like talking about menu planning: it was the key that unlocked my understanding of food, that made me experiment and learn. It was a long, perhaps un-ideal way of teaching myself time and budget constraints and our family’s taste palette, but I would know about none of these things if I didn’t first buy a calendar then look for recipes to fill it with.

Daily walks

There isn’t much to say about individual walks… we follow a path that meanders behind houses alongside the river, cuts through a meadow where there is a park where children don’t play at the early hour we walk past, and then follows a wood chip trail between rows of left-to-grow trees from an abandoned city nursery. Moods vary, both mine and Enzo’s. The weather varies and we bear it, no matter what the offering.

IMG_8479.jpg

Often, when I think of the walks, I don’t think of any particular one… They take on a cumulative quality and so are appreciated like that. Few stand out on their own and yet, the practice of it, the way it marks the beginning of a day must somehow all accumulate for some barely perceptible benefit.

Zoom background

A couple in the family was celebrating their 25th anniversary over Zoom. To demonstrate our good wishes, I made a background, inspired by a paper-flower tutorial here. We set a couch in front to accommodate ourselves comfortably and raised champagne flutes filled with ginger ale when toasts were made.

IMG_8472.JPG
IMG_8476.JPG

Paper crafts are my fave!

A girld named Rachel

This line, over here, reads: “it’s not cool, telling someone you haven’t seen in years that you still think about them…” and I think of so many someones’ from elementary school, a handful from highschool. The high school ones intimidate me still… were I to make an appearance, it would be full of "see-how I changed’s” and angst. But in elementary school, I feel a tenderness toward the few who’ve disappeared from my line of social-media sight… what about that girl who was a poet? One day, coming in possession of a small spiral-bound white-paged notebook full of the possibility of being filled, I handed it to her and asked her to write something while I swayed on a tire swing. She returned it to me with a poem about autumn, stanzas and rhymes included and I could not believe that such a page-filling miracle could occur with such seeming ease.

I hope that somewhere in this world, she is still writing poetry!

Ode

To the people on my morning walk…
The mom walking her pre-teen daughter to school, chatting along the way,
To the dad with the baby on the verge of toddlerhood,
To the man who stands in his garage looking out over the domain of his front lawn, smoking a morning cigarette,
To the mom in the puffer vest hustling her boys into the backseat of her car,
To the lady with the little girl who talks with a lisp and leaves the house with the for sale (now sold) sign in front.
You make my day, as I walk by, as we just barely witness one another, reassuring each other in the thrum of daily life.

Walk

Everyday, I take a walk. The same route, worn by the hundreds of other people who also take walks, nonetheless always has something new to offer… and sometimes to celebrate the discovery I take a picture.

IMG_8384.JPG

Nuts and bolts

Every year at Christmas, my husband would get a tin of “nuts and bolts” that a colleague of his would make as a special holiday treat. Invariably, it only lasted a day in our house. When my husband changed schools, I asked his colleague for the recipe. The amounts indicated are only suggestions!

Nuts and bolts
7-8 cups Crispix cereal
3 cups pretzel sticks
4 cups Goldfish crackers
3 cups Cheerios cereal
3 cups Crunchys (or Cheetos)
3-4 cups Ringolos
3 cups Bugles
1 teaspoon garlic powder
1 sachet of Ranch seasoning
2 tablespoons dried dill
3/4 cup vegetable oil

Dump all the dry ingredients together, except the bugles, in a clean white garbage bag. Whisk together the oil, garlic powder, ranch seasoning and dill into the vegetable and pour over the ingredients in the bag. Knot the bag closed and gently turn and shake it around to distribute the oil and seasonings. Place all or half the amount in a rotisserie pan and cook it at 200C for thirty minutes, mixing halfway through. Once removed from the oven, add the bugles.

Reading list: Middlemarch by George Elliot

How to start: Part way through reading this book, I googled its importance for reassurance. It is, as Robert McCrum wrote in 2014, “supremely a work of serious literature. According to Virginia Woolf, it is ‘one of the few English novels written for grown-up people’.” To quote McCrum again, it is “a work of genius” and his article provides a glimpse at why.

Favourite quotes: “Notions and scruples were like spilt needles, making one afraid of treading, or sitting down, or even eating.” (p. 22)

“Sometimes, when her uncle’s easy way of talking did not happen to be exasperating, it was rather soothing.” (p. 39)

“We mortals, men and women, devour many a disappointment between breakfast and dinner-time; keep back the tears and look a little pale about the lips, and in answer to inquiries say, ‘Oh, nothing!’ Pride helps us; and pride is not a bad thing when it only urges us to hide our own hurts - not to hurt others.” (p. 62)

[About Casaubon’s blood not being red:] “‘no, somebody put a drop under a magnifying-glass, and it was all semicolons and parenthesis,’ said Mrs. Codewallader.” (p. 70)

“That element of tragedy which lies in the very fact of frequency, has not yet wrought itself into the course emotion of mankind; and perhaps our frames could hardly bear much of it. If we had a keen vision and feeling of all ordinary human life, it would be like hearing the grass grow and the squirrel’s heart beat, and we should die of that roar which lies on the other side of silence. As it is, the quickest of us walk about well wadded with stupidity.” (p. 189).

“Mortals are easily tempted to pinch the life out of their neighbour’s buzzing glory, and think that such killing is no murder.” (p. 201)

“The best piety is to enjoy - when you can. You are doing the most then to save the earth’s character as an agreeable planet. And enjoyment radiates.” (p. 213)

“You will hardly demand that his confidence should have a basis in external facts; such confidence, we know, is something less course and materialistic: it is a comfortable disposition leading us to expect that the wisdom of providence or the folly of our friends, the mysteries of luck or the still greater mystery of our high individual value in the universe, will bring about agreeable issues, such as are consistent with our good taste in costume, and our general preference for the best style of a thing.” (p. 220)

“He was one or those rare men who are rigid to themselves and indulgent to others.” (p. 223)

“Indeed we are most of us brought up in the notion that the highest motive for not doing a wrong is something irrespective of the beings who would suffer the wrong.” (p. 239)

“‘Poor dear Dido how dreadful!’ said Celia, feeling as much grieved as her own perfect happiness would allow.” (p. 275)

“Mr Casaubon, indeed, had not thoroughly represented those mixed reasons to himself; irritated feeling with him as with all of us, seeking rather for justification than for self-knowledge.” (p. 316)

“That by desiring what is perfectly good, even when we don’t quite know what it is and cannot do what we would, we are part of the divine power against evil - widening the skirts of light and making the struggle with darkness narrower.” (p. 276)

“What loneliness is more lonely than distrust?” (p. 421)

Tangential: If another argument for reading Middlemarch should be made, I really enjoy Kathryne Schulz’s “What Is It About Middlemarch?

This thing our beagle does...

I’m sure it’s made national news by now, that Winnipeg was blanketed by snow, heavy and wet, all 24 centimetres of it. The precipitation is welcome, winter’s last gasp less so.

IMG_8378.jpg

Our beagle runs through the snow, snout down. Sometimes, in a drift, he freezes, all attention focused, as if perhaps he can hear somethings scuttling underneath. He then springs up and plants his head, like a spear, into the snow. It makes me think of a fox, smaller, a bit clumsier, less bushy-tailed, but still so, so hilarious.

Tutoring

As the second term as a writing tutor comes to a close this week, I want to bask a moment in the delightful variety of requests I’ve seen over the fall and winter semesters that services have been offered.

Sometimes it begins with the assignment. I suspect professors have a whole variety of reasons for giving assignments, but some of the time, assignments are meant to forge new neural pathways or develop new skills, like the challenge of close reading and analysis, or developing an argument based on source readings. In all these cases, I become re-acquainted with past experiences in which I had to get comfortable with stating an opinion, with learning to avoid summary when it wasn’t necessary, with familiarizing myself with events and people that were completely foreign to my experience. It is now an exciting thing to be dropped into a historical scene and to feel the drive to scramble to find reference points.

Sometimes it’s the writing. I realize it has taken me years to get a grip on academic writing and it doesn’t come naturally. For one thing, writing can feel extremely personal, and a tutor can help remind a student that an essay is just a product of your thoughts on a subject. For another, essay-writing is a skill that can be perfected over time. I feel bad for students who write with a kind of desperation about their marks… “I need an A” is terrible pressure to put on yourself - just as if an aspiring athlete were to declare to their coach on the first day of practice: “I need a gold medal”. Assignments are best viewed as exercises, in my opinion. With time their complexity becomes manageable and the lagging bits catch up to the stronger bits to compose a reliably good whole.

Sometimes it’s the detail. Academic writing requires citation and there are three kinds and each kind has a strict set of rules that lay out a finicky amount of detail. I’ve discovered that finding the right format and then applying it throughout the essay takes a surprising amount of time. It is also somewhat mindless work during which I can have Netflix playing while formatting the details.

What I most enjoyed this year is noticing how tutoring has changed for me… instead of thinking of myself as a person with all the answers who will tell a student how to write a perfect essay, I now think of myself as more of a guidepost. A student is somewhere along the path to writing good essays and they come visit for the next nudge in the right direction. I have left my lofty place to melt myself into that particular student’s challenge and try to hand them the most practical tool for meeting it. It’s just as much an exercise for me in anticipating what could be most constructive and useful at a single point in time, versus the tendency to overwhelm or the temptation to generalize too broadly.

Swedish death cleaning my social media

I decided to go through some of my social media and delete old posts… Here are a few things I noticed:

  1. I’m turning into a private person, or at least a more private person than I was before. I’m struck by how, in my own youth, I had an eagerness to share and to be open. I don’t think I’ve changed too dramatically, but the need for third-party approval has diminished a little.

  2. Taking down old posts feels like taking back a bit of control. It might be an illusion, but given how onerous it is to do on some sites, doing so feels good.

  3. Old pictures and craftily-worded thoughts give me a false pang of nostalgia… I say its false because a) I don’t like dwelling on nostalgic thoughts and b) social media represents a small percentage of my life and c) the people and the relationships those posts present/represent, are with me, in albums in my house, in the phone calls and visits we continue to make with each other.

  4. The exercise highlights the importance of being in the present moment. The accumulation of posts made are all bits of past me… past efforts, past struggles, past happiness… and “saving them” would feel like taking away from the importance and beauty of the present. We’re here, I’m here, let’s be here today!

Solving for x

Interior decorators Hollister and Porter Hovey were featured on Cup of Jo with an apartment makeover and helpful tips to boot, one of which reads: “People often neglect hallways but it’s a great opportunity for a fun experience.”

Now, if we take that sentence and pretend it’s math, and say, “people often neglect x, but x is a great opportunity for a fun experience.” Then, using a crude expression you could “plug in” anything for x, to solve for fun. Maybe x is running errands. Maybe x is spending time running errands with someone else. Maybe x is running someone else’s errands. No matter, you can solve for fun.

Take my mother-in-law: game for adventure, disdainful of Covid-induced paranoia. Subtract the generational gap, the minor things that run the risk of grating on each other’s nerves, like a bit of hearing loss and someone else’s soft voice, and, with a dramatic sweep of the arm, create a vacuum of space on the imaginary whiteboard filled with scribbled sums and plop in a recurring Thursday afternoon visit. Let the things that are on her mind gush in and settle in the container of your calm availability. And then, as if by magic, Thursday afternoons become little short stories of their own: sweatpants shopping for her husband, stove browsing at furniture and appliance stores, watch-hunting high and low, wig querying in a nostalgic revisit to the sixties, replacement shirt shopping for a newly liquidated favourite brand, shampoo selecting for volume at Wal-Mart and a surprise black-out. And always, finding a treat: muffins at Tim Horton’s, McDonalds after lockdown, an introduction to Orange Julius, cinnamon buns from Tall Grass Prairie.

Don’t neglect the hallways!

Silence vs screaming

When confronted with suffering, fictional or real accounts, in books or on screen, I get the perverse temptation to imagine what I would do in the victim’s position. A hero or heroin faced with violence either screams and fights or bears the trial in silence. I am averse to noise and always imagine myself a stoically unwilling to waste my breath.

Catholic saints were often depicted as extraordinarily courageous… St. Lawrence, placed on a gridiron over coals, famously told his tormentors to turn him over, to roast the other side. Hagiography abounds in such stories. As a teenager, I admired Lawrence of Arabia’s secular fortitude.

I’m reading Hope Against Hope by Nadeshda Mandelstam in which she wrote: “Later I often wondered whether it is right to scream when you are being beaten and trampled underfoot. Isn’t it better to face one’s tormentors in a stance of satanic pride, answering them with contemptuous silence? I decided that it is better to scream. This pitiful sound, which sometimes, goodness knows how, reaches into the remotest prison cell, is a concentrated expression of the last vestige of human dignity. It is a man’s way of leaving a trace, of telling people how he lived and died. By his screams he asserts his right to live, sends a message to the outside world demanding help and calling for resistance. If nothing else is left, one must scream. Silence is the real crime against humanity.”

In the second season of The Last Kingdom, Uhtred and his friend Halig are sold into slavery. As punishment for trying to escape, Halig is tied to the ship’s prow as Uhtred and the other men row. Halig yells each time the prow is raised enough for him to do so. This seems to fire Uhtred’s rowing, and when Halig no longer screams, Uhtred knows that death has released his friend from the torture. Halig’s screams seemed like the final act of bravery and a kindness to Uhtred.

Silence or screams… all to say that it wasn’t until lately that I’ve learned screams could have virtue.

Reading list: The Russian Debutante's Handbook by Gary Shteyngart

How to start: I sometimes plod through a book, but that was not the case with this one, speeding through in barely two weeks. Francine Prose notes the novel’s “energy and hilarity.” The New York Times qualifies it as “uproarious and highly entertaining.” And perhaps knowing neither of these things was what made the book such a quick read.

Favourite quotes: “He looked down the tracks where Cohen was on his knees taking a picture of a passing cloud, an unremarkable cirrus shaped as if it were sketched expressly for a meteorology textbook, its immortality assured only through the wild Polish luck of having passed the former concentration camp on the day of Cohen’s visit.” (p. 405-6)

[This one of a car-chase sequence:]

“The thin Trabant squeezed past a trailer truck in front of them bearing the logo of a Swedish modular funiture company.
”Shell-shocked, Vladimir crawled back up to look through the nonexistent window behind him. The Swedish furniture trick now separated their car from the Groundhog’s shooting party like some kind of ad hoc U.N. reaction force. But the Hog’s men apparently had no respect for Swedish furniture. With a single-mindedness common only to former Soviet interior-ministry troops and first-year law students, they continued to shoot as the truck swerved madly to stay on the road. Finally, their labor produced results - with an audible whoosh, the back doors of the truck blew away.
”A houseful of Krovnik dining tables in assorted colours, Skanör solid-beech glass-door cabinets, Arkitekt retractable work lamps (with adjustable heads), and the daddy of them all - a Grinda three-piece sofa ensemble in ‘modern paisley,’ came sailing out of the back of the truck and onto the flotilla of BMWs to settle once and for all the Russo-Swedish War of 1709.” (p. 444)

Tangential: This is Shteyngart’s debut novel, published in 2002. What’s fun about that is that it makes him a contemporary, instead of a long-dead novelist like most of the ones on this list. He’s since published more novels, obviously, and someone’s collected his blurbs on Tumblr. Oh look! He’s just received his Covid shot!

A poem about not debating

I wonder why
I feel this pull to opinion
To saying what I think 
On some big issue.
If writing were a canoe
An issue would be the current
And my weak arms
Could hardly protest its pull. 

The issue is very big.
Its size has grown by dint 
Of tiny injustices
Of hidden shames
Of secret experiences
Accumulating over time
Becoming
Conversations
Then homilies
Court cases
Then political platforms
Then sides taken.

It’s a morass of debate
And wading in
Vociferating from
Orifices where food is ingested
Where the tongue resides
Warm and wet
Its movement against white teeth
And pink skin and red muscle
Produce a spray of 
Airborne particles
That fall
And thus
Shards of experience
Broken-off bits of religious principle
Driftwood pieces of logical argument
And some statistics like fine gravel
Are lobbed through the air. 

Wearying and unsatisfactory
As the stand might be
It beckons like the call of a temptation;
A pretty chocolate egg
That says “come eat me”
And lends to the mouth
A momentary power of consumption
While enslaving the taste buds
And filling the gut with a brown empty mass
And throwing the hormones into chaotic activity
And giving the brain a sense of useless purposefulness.

I want to do you the kindness
Of not eating the egg.

Writing inspo

Excerpt from an interview with Jiayang Fan on the Longform Podcast:

I guess what I would want to encourage in aspiring writers who have scraped up against that self-doubt as a result of a life not lived, you know, for a career in journalism, is that, please write into your self-doubt; write into that sense that perhaps you are not deserving. There’s something authentic and pure in that voice and your investigations into yourself and the world deserves to know the quality of your uncertainty and there is something very, very edifying, I think, to the world to know about the really complicated barriers between a writer’s lack of sense of self and the self that emerges on the page. And that we need you - I’m speaking directly to those writers now - we need you more than ever because you give us something that writers from traditional backgrounds, in all their certainty and grace and eloquence, cannot, which is, you know, the truest exploration of how a self becomes a self and to those writers, please continue listening to podcasts like these ones and also to believe that you have something really worthy of being heard.

Marilynne Robinson wrote in her essay collection titled The Givenness of Things:

I hope I will not seem eccentric when I say that God’s love for the world is something it is also useful to ponder. Imagine humankind acting freely within the very broad limits of its gifts, its capacity for discerning the good and just and shaping the beautiful. If God has taken pleasure in his creation, there is every reason to assume that some part of his pleasure is in your best idea, your most generous impulse, your most disciplined thinking on whatever is true, honourable, just, pure, pleasing, excellent, and worthy of praise. I am paraphrasing Paul, of course, but if you have read Cicero or The Egyptian Book of the Dead, for example, you know that pre-Christians and pagans made art and literature and philosophy excellent and worthy of praise, out of love for the thought of all these things. (…) My point is simply that, from the time the first hominid looked up at the stars and was amazed by them, a sweet savor has been rising from this earth, every part of it - a silent music worthy of God’s pleasure. What we have expressed compared with what we have found no way to express, is overwhelmingly the lesser part. Loyalties and tenderness that we are scarcely aware of might seem, from a divine perspective, the most beautiful things in creation, even in their evanescence. Such things are universally human. They forbid the distinctions “us” and “them”.

Going light

I have a tendency to go deep, to get bogged down, to stare at the ground and feel the weight of things. But going for a walk? Going for a walk reminds me to be light, to look up, to find colour, to notice the sun…

IMG_8122.JPG
IMG_8207.JPG
IMG_8256.JPG

Swimming lessons

Sometimes, a thing from childhood will bubble up, like gas in a swamp. It happened to me recently when I was talking to a trained lifeguard and joking about how my younger brother is a certified lifeguard and how, in contrast to him, I can’t swim. I think this family paradox is funny. I also think that it perfectly reflects the kind of contradictory mother I had. Telling people about this, turning it into a joke, is a kind of way of relieving aggrieved feelings - wasn’t I owed swimming lessons?

Writing about childhood is hard. John le Carré hinted at this in his memoir The Pigeon Tunnel, in the chapter about his father near the end of the book. He tried writing at length about it when he was young, but the efforts “dripped with self-pity”.

I recognize in my comments that compensatory ruefulness my dad also had when he talked about my mother. It’s unsatisfying, and more often than not, it’s unfair to the person listening. Rather than being an amusing anecdote, it’s an escaped journal entry, one of those as Mason Currey writes in a newsletter that “can be relentlessly inward-looking and personal-grievance-focused, which is always a pleasure for the writer (and almost never a pleasure for the reader).”

On an episode of Conversations, George Saunders describes how a character in a story has to have more than one dimension:

What you find yourself doing as a writer, is, you have a bad character; if he’s simply bad section after section, you’re gonna be boring. So you have to complicate him, which means you have to look closer at him, just as in real life, you know (…) the person who pushes you aside getting on to the subway, at first he’s a terrible person. If you could follow him home, you know, and ask him some questions, you’d see him assuming dimensionality. So that happens to me in stories all the time.

And so, since good writing demands it, and since I am still learning, allow me to edit my clumsy attempt at humour. You see, my mother was an aesthete, descended from a woman, my Grandmother, who praised good looks and fine clothes. It was out of aesthetic concern that my mother enrolled my brother for swim class after swim class so that he would cut a fine figure. For years and years I mistook this as a more practical concern for health and for the ability to not drown in water. How much did she pay, I wondered, for all those lessons and the swimming pool membership? And it was only when attempting to tally an amount (was it hundreds? did it stretch to thousands?) that I realized she had spent a similar sum on me… not so that I would cut a fine figure, but so that I could show all of my teeth when I smiled. While my brother swam laps, I sat through appointment after appointment in the orthodontist’s chair for braces. This, in my mother’s mind, was fair; I had straight teeth and my brother had a swimmer’s physique.

NBD

In the ninth episode of the “Darts and Letters” podcast, the host, Gordon Katic, interviews a person who writes papers for students across a variety of academic disciplines, for a variety of programs. The anonymous guest reflects on his ability to meet his clients’ expectations by professing “a natural curiosity for subjects” and an aptitude for “pattern recognition” that can appreciate and imitate a discipline’s “jargon”.

I’m against academic dishonesty, and I’m far too interested in writing my own paper and far too poor to pay someone else to do the work. That being said, this interviewee is a surprising source of motivation… Procrastinating, like a regular student, he says, he manages to turn in lengthy assignments in a short time. It has cheered me to think of this “Bill Faulkner” reading a Master’s degree thesis or two in Canadian history, and sitting down and producing a 120-page document in a week like it was no big deal.